hrservices.be banner

Tools

PwC service offerings

Tags

accounting treatment Belgium capital-sharing company cars crisis measures double tax treaty employee employees employment tax EU Regulation 883/2004 exemption fiscal benefit Flanders foreign income HR environment HR Services Human Resources income tax indexation India Lambermont life insurance marital quotient system pensions personal income tax private PC profit-sharing profit participation PTX registration duties salary slips salary tresholds second company car severance pay social security treaty stock option stock option income tax taxation tax reduction tax reform tax treatment Uruguay withholding tax work permit

Site search

RSS RSS – HRS Headlines

Sharing knowledge
The Tax Guide in De Tijd/L'Echo was created with the help of our Personal Tax Consultants

Calculate your car policy’s VAT cost

13Jan

Part-time workers: non-refutable full-time employment presumption

 

The Program Law of 27 December 2004 has been published in the Official Gazette of 31 December 2004 (*). This law includes, among others, a major change for employers employing workers on a part-time basis, i.e. lots of employers.

Context:

Companies or individuals employing part-time workers have to comply with a number of specific formalities, and notably with publicity requirements of the part-time workers’ working hours. In case of breach of these publicity requirements, part-time workers are presumed to be full-time workers by the social security service (RSZ/ONSS). As a result, the employer is liable for payment of employer and employee RSZ/ONSS contributions on a full-time equivalent salary (i.e. the salary the beneficiary would have been entitled to on a full time basis). This sanction was however not applied when the employer could provide evidence that the employee was actually a part-time worker.

News:

As from 1 January 2005, this presumption is not refutable by the employer anymore. As a result, employers failing to comply with the publicity requirements for part-time workers’ working hours, are likely to have to pay the ONSS/RSZ contributions on a full-time equivalent salary, except if the social inspection would itself state that the employee at stake could not materially carry out a full-time employment (e.g. because he/she is also employed by another employer).

The level of the sanction (i.e. 35% employer contributions and 13,07% employee contribution applied to a non existing salary) should encourage employers to ensure compliance with the aforesaid publicity requirements.

(*) http://news.hrservices.be?lk200501121

Share